Talk:Evernote/Archives/2016

Shifting article of Evernote as a company

I was wondering if it would make more sense to shift Evernote as a company rather than as a software. Evernote has shipped a variety of applications including Skitch, Penultimate, Webclipper, etc and I think it would make more sense to have Evernote Corporation at the top rather than in the middle. Or perhaps we could move Evernote Corporation into its own article?

I just want to be clear and abide by Wikipedia's rules that I do work for Evernote and the reason we want to do this is because Google is having trouble associating us with their knowledge graph as a company. I don't want to conflict with the interest of the Wikipedia community though.

Thoughts?

Augbog (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I would think that most people looking for "Evernote" intend the software. It would not be unreasonable to create a new article "Evernote Corporation" using the content of the section by that name. I don't think it makes sense to turn the article for the software into an article for the company. Right now the history section is a weird mix of software and corporate info. If this looks like a good idea, I could make a quick edit to start the ECorp article. LaMona (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Since the article is predominantly about the software developed by the corporation, IMO the info should be presented in that order. I personally think the corporation is notable enough to have it's own article, linking to this and it's other notable works.

I've marked the edit request as declined; I agree with LaMona. If you feel it's appropriate, you can reopen the request. fredgandt 19:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

It sounds like we are okay with creating a new article for "Evernote Corporation" and just reusing the content from this article? I also don't believe we should get rid of Evernote as a software article for the same reason -- most people know Evernote as the software. The truth is Evernote Corp has shipped other products i.e. Scannable, Penultimate, Skitch, etc so I feel it makes sense to make a separate Evernote Corporation article. Let me know your guys' thoughts but for now I've removed the declined requested edit. Augbog (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evernote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120530/http://www.lextrait.com/Vincent/implementations.html to http://www.lextrait.com/Vincent/implementations.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)