Talk:Ezra

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ezra article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Ezra was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 15, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Bible Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Top‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Saints High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as High-importance).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Deny sock

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evert Wandelaar. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Persian satrapies

Accurate or not Aramaic portion of the book of Ezra seems to indicate Ezra had been selected by by a Persian king to rule as a "Minister of Justice" (satrap) in the entire region of "trans- Euphrates". Obviously this did not work out. Hammondwest (talk) 04:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persian satrapies

It does appear Ezra wielded tremendous secular power with all the divorces ordered in the biblical account. Hammondwest (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

chapter 7 genealogy

it's worth mentioning the genealogy of Ezra to Aaron difficult to exaggerate the importance of detailed genealogies even when critiquing them. Hammondwest (talk) 06:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ark of the covenant

if Ezra was reported by Artaxerxes to have the law of God "in his hands" could this have been the Ten Commandments? Clearly the Persians we're smart enough not to allow the Ark to return to Judah but they let many other temple relics return. Hammondwest (talk) 06:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

I did some rewriting of the timeline section. There are some problems mentioned in the beginning, but it nevers becomes very clear what the problems are. Maybe somebody can explain what they are.

The chonology of Ezra/Nehemia as written seems simple enought, with Ezra coming to Jeruzalem in the 7th year and Nehemia in the 20th year Artaxerxes, with Ezra still being present and they are then shown acting together. So whatever Artaxerxes (I or II) is meant, it is clearly the same one. A much bigger problem is having neighbouring peoples sending a letter to Artaxerces in the first mission of Zerubbabel. This is clearly an anachronism. It could very well be that the building was pauzed for some decades because of a letter sent, but it should have been sent to Cyrus, of Cambyses if more time had gone by then the story suggests. So apperently when the story was written, names from the time of Nehemia were used in this part of the story. Remember that Ezra/Nehemia were certainly written at a single book, so such a thing might have easily happened. Also the menitoning of Ahasveros (probably Xerxes) in verse 4:6 and then writing to Artachsasta (Artaxerxes) in 4:7 shows more confusion on who was really participating here. All this suggest the story was only written down after several generations of retelling and well after the events had happened. Quite often it is believed to be the same author as the Book of Chronicles, as these books appear to be a direct continuation. Given the fact that the writer of Chronicles also tends to mess up simple facts, this could very well be the same person. Codiv (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]