Talk:F5, Inc.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Advertising

It seems to me that this F5 article reads rather like an advert for the company.

GregHarewood 15:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the passages with the most blatant advertising and did a bit of a reorganization. --Amir E. Aharoni 08:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does read like an advert, but it lacks the most basic info: Where did the phrase "F5" come from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.48.115 (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It says it in the Corporate history section: F5 is a type of a tornado. --Amir E. Aharoni 10:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added to the name section from F5's official brand guidelines information about the name:

   The story behind our name
   F5, originally named F5 Labs and then known as
   F5 Networks, was founded in 1996. The name F5 is
   taken from the Fujita scale of ratings for tornado intensity,
   where F5 is the most intense. Our F5 red ball glows
   brightly from our hardware that’s housed in data centers
   across the globe.
   ^[1]  (page 3)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinshattuck (talk • contribs) 06:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are links in the text to F5's site. Does that need to go? StripeyBadger (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed excessive links to BIG-IP.

Having one link to the company homepage is OK. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added new information. FirePass and Wanjet will run as modules under version 9.4.0. If you feel like verifying this call marketing. I do not want to talk to them. I work for F5 so I might have some bias but I think that the article compared to past articles reads less like an advert and has more accurate info now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.47.123 (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it seems to me that the F5 article reads like an advert for the competition without all of the facts. If the article is about F5, then it should focus on facts about F5. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.85.211.196 (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a fairly major overhaul of the article to start to add some citations and update product information which was getting out of date. Gavint0 (talk) 16:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is out of date again. That is why I like citing mostly archived pages and using past tense! W Nowicki (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible company description

Can somebody re-write this so one can tell what the company actually does besides "optimize" stuff? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.61.95 (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Include new offerings

Much has changed with F5 Networks over the years and should be reflected. They (f5 / f5 silverline) just won an award that got announced at RSA last week about their web application firewall and cloud waf offering. Their acquisition of defense.net has lead to Silverline, albeit income is not disclosed but has become a big project within their organization. ^[2]

--Justin Shattuck (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Ticketbleed to Big-IP section

Ticketbleed needs to be merge to the F5 Networks BIG-IP section of this article. Not notable enough after one day of discovery to be a whole article.— አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed, or just delete it, not much to merge except maybe one sentence. Also see an article today W Nowicki (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on F5 Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NGINX Aquistion

NGINX (open source leader in application delivery) for US$670 million on March 11, 2019[24]

The description "open source leader in application delivery" seems out of type with its peers, and quite opinionated. Looks like it was from the F5 press release.

KJ4IPS (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the above to "web server and application server vendor" as well as editing the entry to reflect NGINX, Inc, and not NGINX (the software).

There is no page for NGINX, inc. at this time, so it currently links to NGINX. Possibly a candidate for a redirect.

KJ4IPS (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The other acquisitions only list date by year, should this be reduced to the year?

KJ4IPS (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone know why this page is constantly trending? Nswix (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Employees section is out of date

Only Gilad Bracha is currently still with F5 (he's a Technical Fellow) - the other 3 mentioned are no longer there Zmolek (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.f5.com/pdf/f5/brand-guidelines.pdf

[2] ttp://www.scmagazine.com/sc-awards-2016/section/5433/?publishDate=False&timestamp=635852806671307920

[1]

[2]