Talk:FIBA EuroBasket 2011 qualification

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Basketball

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles

Map[edit]

Someone needs to update the map showing qualified teams after they decided 24 teams will pariticipate.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartman77 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rang[edit]

I think Great Britain has qualified as one of the best second place teams at least. Also says in this article they have qualfied.Deficitattentionprogram (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We'll, still depends on the other two groups. It is too early to say, maybe at the end UK's score difference will be smaller then the others. Let's wait till Sunday. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 23:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If they lose then they are 6-2, no other second place team can beat that. They have already qualified. Deficitattentionprogram (talk) 01:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I strongly believe that Macedonia and the UK will be part of the EuroBasket 2011 and since this English article did not highlight the rang from the beginning, why not waiting until Sunday? --MacedonianBoy (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GBR-BIH attendance?[edit]

do nobody knows the attendance?--Riki94mk (talk) 01:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it´s not in the Report (and it isn´t) it´s tough to find out. Kante4 (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional QR[edit]

As far as I can see on FIBA Europe's web page 10 teams are qualified for the additional round. Should we follow that new rule or we should count the old one with six teams? --MacedonianBoy (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We should trust FIBA first and see what happens... Kante4 (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone has a source to the relevant FIBA decision? They must have changed that after the draw was made in January.--Nitsansh (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked here and it is different than it was or? But if you read through the news it sound different, with saying "There is good news too for Bulgaria, who earn third place and will also be in the additional qualifying round." Kante4 (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely different than it was at the beginning of the qualification, so the decision must have been recently. As for Bulgaria, they would have qualified for AQR anyway. It's the like of Latvia, Hungary, Finland and Portugal who benefitted from the change.--Nitsansh (talk) 22:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just quoted this line with Bulgaria because it was the first i saw. But why they highlight it that Bulgaria "qualified" for the additional round if everyone qualified for that? That´s why i was curios. Kante4 (talk) 22:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QR is set. Kante4 (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]