Talk:FTC v. Microsoft

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FTC v. Microsoft article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "FTC v. Microsoft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

FTC v. Microsoft has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 30, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Really doesn't need a separate article, yet...

For court cases, we do not really cover day-to-day events in the courtroom, as we are looking at the long-term implications. As well as given this is only the hearing to determine if there will be a preliminary injunction placed on the merger, which itself may affect the merger itself. Should this get to a full case (that is, presuming that a preliminary injunction is granted and MS decides to continue with the merger and thus fight the FTC further), then perhaps a separate page makes sense. I would recommend draftying this until we have a better picture if this legal action is that important to get into that much depth, separate from the existing proposed acquisition page. Masem (t) 01:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at how the process would go at WP:DRAFTIFY, however I see that this article may have already been reviewed by new page patrol, and therefore valid stuff - though it does seem it was the author that assessed this as B-class based on talk page history. Anyhow, it is now ~79 days after article creation and the PI has not been granted, how should this proceed? ZigZagZoug (talk) 01:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:FTC v. Microsoft/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ElijahPepe (talk · contribs) 04:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 20:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

Generally very well written and almost a GA already. Below are some nitpicks and indications of a thorough check. I would also be grateful if you'd be willing to review Microsoft and unions an article with overlap in topic but distinct enough still.

Issues should be resolved. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Y All images are permissably licensed, as they're WP:Public Domain (needs improved labels)

I spot checked the following sources and will continue to look further as you make improvements:

Y ^[1]
Y ^[2]
? This is an imprecise summary. It says that Sony (Playstation) won't have access to Elder Scrolls, but that doesn't mean it will be exclusively available on Xbox.^[3]

Changes required

ended it if granted -> would halt the acquisition if granted
filed against the company -> against Activision Blizzard
are scheduled for December 2023 -> What happened in December? This is past tense so needs updating
criticized Khan -> criticized FTC Chair Lina Khan
Judges Daniel P. Collins, Danielle J. Forrest, and Jennifer Sung are depicted, but no context is provided that they are the judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in either image labels or the body of articles.
(Re)move WP:CRUFT e.g this passage does not add anything directly in the paragraph:
- Documents submitted by Sony appeared to have been redacted using a black Sharpie but, upon being scanned in, the redacted figures were legible. The documents show that Horizon Forbidden West (2022) cost US$212 million over five years with 300 employees while The Last of Us Part II (2020) cost US$220 million with 200 employees.
Added categories
- Category:United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases
- Category:Federal Trade Commission litigation

Document leak

The lede wording is very confusing. It feels both undue to mention the leak, and even if due, the wording is unclear about the fact that the Xbox designs were accidentally uploaded. In the section about Document leak itself, please expand on significant and commentary that ensued afterwards. Also include full date years. September in what year?

Second round of feedback =

ElijahPepe please ping me when you're done with second round of improvements requested

despite making Redfall (2023) and Starfield (2023) exclusive to Windows and Xbox. -> despite making newly acquired ZeniMax Media franchises Redfall (2023) and Starfield (2023) exclusive to Windows and Xbox.
Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley -> judge Jacqueline Scott Corley (lowercase judge per MOS:JOBTITLE)
Bureau of Competition -> FTC Bureau of Competition
Remove with an internal FTC hearing scheduled for three weeks after the court issues its opinion. (has no point)
On September 15, -> September 15, 2023
Injunction case -> when did the preliminary hearing happen?
wiki link Multiplatform with Cross-platform software

@Shushugah: Done. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ElijahPepe Congratulations on a

Good article! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 02:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Roth, Emma (2022-02-09). "Microsoft says it will keep Call of Duty on PlayStation 'beyond the existing agreement'". The Verge. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
^ Kang, Cecilia (2023-07-12). "F.T.C.'s Court Loss Raises Fresh Questions About Its Chair's Strategy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
^ Collier, Kevin (September 19, 2023). "Microsoft's Xbox plans revealed in emails tied to FTC case". NBC News. Archived from the original on September 19, 2023. Retrieved September 19, 2023.

[1] Roth, Emma (2022-02-09). "Microsoft says it will keep Call of Duty on PlayStation 'beyond the existing agreement'". The Verge. Retrieved 2024-08-19.

[2] Kang, Cecilia (2023-07-12). "F.T.C.'s Court Loss Raises Fresh Questions About Its Chair's Strategy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-08-19.

[3] Collier, Kevin (September 19, 2023). "Microsoft's Xbox plans revealed in emails tied to FTC case". NBC News. Archived from the original on September 19, 2023. Retrieved September 19, 2023.

[1]

[2]

[3]