Talk:Facebook diplomacy
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The contents of the Facebook diplomacy page were merged into Digital diplomacy#Facebook diplomacy on 1 January 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
To-do list for Facebook diplomacy:
Priority 1 (top)
|
Challenge against Speedy Deletion
[edit]The Facebook diplomacy page should not be deleted. I User:Problemsmith have researched public diplomacy for some time and researched over 12 bona-fide articles that mention "Facebook diplomacy" there are over 6 articles already cited therein including one from Newsweek where Facebook diplomacy is in the title.
I have additional articles that will be included and plan to add to the article, but the article has enough good references currently for publication on Wikipedia.
If the article title is not permitted I will agree to move it and re-title it that is, IF IT VIOLATES Policy or Wikipwdia best practice. If I were to move it I would move it to social network diplomacy but actually it is a real form of diplomacy style that has been made possible by the semi-private platform developments of Facebook, however the Facebook company is not a protagonist in the article, diplomacy is. Problemsmith 07:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Its a good article on international relations using Facebook
[edit]Looks like the article, it can use more references and work but I do not believe it should be deleted and appears to fit in multiple categories and should be picked up by two or more Wiki Projects. I will add categories to it and remove the {{db-test]] tag because it clearly does not fall under CSD G2 criteria for deletion. I think I will also recommend this article to some students at USC Center on Public Diplomacy to take this on as a project or contribute to its further elaboration. I am not sure if it should be retitled and moved considering the references. As an article it qualifies as an un-assessed article and should be categorized under diplomacy and social networking. I will look at the article again later to see if it needs to be re-tagged for any other reason and contact the author. Ingenosa (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Other Article Titles Suggested
[edit]I am unsure of international laws on copyright use of the Facebook name in this term or as to whether Facebook is a place or a company now, it appears in this article as to Facebook being a place. If someone insists the title should be changed, other titles that may be appropriate for this one are digital diplomacy, e-diplomacy, or social network diplomacy because they all appear as one in the same relative to some eleven other articles visible in the hard copy print news and in various website news articles. Reference to public diplomacy 2.0 should probably be considered as well.Ingenosa (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
All the title suggestions are the same
[edit]I am not a Wikipedia editor but I saw this article this morning and see it has been challenged, I work on Facebook and throughout the social networking world as one of the ambassadors being referred to and concur that digital diplomacy, e-diplomacy, and social network diplomacy are the same and that internet diplomacy is a valid term also, but references are clear that it was started on facebook. § —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boffin1157 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Renaming the page to Digital Diplomacy
[edit]I suggest this page should be renamed to Digital Diplomacy and be merged with eDiplomacy. Facebook_diplomacy, Google Diplomacy, Twitter Diplomacy (or Twiplomacy) and Citizen_diplomacy should be just sub categories. PS.: I might be biased (I am the author of the Twiplomacy study on the use of Twitter by heads of state and government and diplomats. http://twiplomacy.com) Any volunteers? Thanks Lufkens (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Facebook diplomacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091109020729/http://english.vovnews.vn:80/Home/Foreign-ministry-promotes-digital-diplomacy/200910/109290.vov to http://english.vovnews.vn/Home/Foreign-ministry-promotes-digital-diplomacy/200910/109290.vov
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091223084011/http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Facebook_Developer_Garage to http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Facebook_Developer_Garage
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Needs updating
[edit]I added the tag as the references and text are from several years ago. Given the change in social media in that time the page should be updated to include those changes. Perhaps even talking about use by state and state sponsored actors.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusfriend (talk • contribs) 09:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)