Jump to content

Talk:Fader Bergström/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this one today! --K. Peake 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox looks good!
    • Thanks.
  • Remove the best-known and best-loved songs part, as that is not sourced
    • Done.
  • Add a sentence ending the lead about the reception/legacy of the composition
    • Done.

Context

[edit]
  • Good
    • Thanks.

Song

[edit]

Music and verse form

[edit]
  • Add relevant text to the audio sample to justify usage
    • Added.
  • Pipe 3/4 time to Triple metre
    • Done.

Lyrics

[edit]

Reception

[edit]

^* Done.

  • Are you sure unbridled is an appropriate term here?
    • Said 'unrestrained' instead. Means the same thing.
  • Pipe street-girls to Prostitution
    • Done.
  • Add the release year of Glimmande nymf
    • Added.
  • Imgs look good!!
    • Thanks.

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks quite good at 31.5%!
    • Noted.
  • Should ref 13 be cited in place of ref 8 since it includes p. 149?
    • Merged refs.
  • Remove or replace ref 16 per WP:RSPYT
    • Removed.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
  • Good
    • Thanks.

Final comments and verdict

[edit]

Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]