Talk:Fading (song)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 1111tomica (talk · contribs) 18:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Another reviewer is need because the current one is also a part Wikiproject Rihanna and could be bias.
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs · count) 05:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not particularly knowledgeably about this good girl gone bad, (the lead of this article already has new info), but I'll give it a shot. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No. Has had an AFD within the past two weeks. This led to major expansion which shows has not been stable during its nomination |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. |
Quick fail for stability (as shown by this major expansion). Try again in a month or so. (Nice read though). Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
The writers are in correct for this song. Ester Dean did not write this song. Quintin Amey p.k.a King Epiq wrote the lyrics of this song. [1] Check info on Itunes for the song and it will tell you that. The song had the wrong credits for the first shipments of the album and then they went on to correct that afterwards. Some websites even have the correct writers listed besides wikipedia if you search google. Rodgerdat (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)