Talk:Fagus langevinii
Appearance
A fact from Fagus langevinii appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 February 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Fagus langevinii (pictured) is considered the oldest extinct beech tree species? Source: Denk & Grimm (2009) The biogeographic history of beech trees pg88
- ALT1: ... that Fagus langevinii (pictured) is known from cupules, blades, nuts, and grains? Source: Manchester & Dillhoff 2004 descriptions of the type fossil cupules, nuts, leaf blades, and pollen grains.
- Reviewed:
Template:Did you know nominations/Taraxacum arcticumTemplate:Did you know nominations/Rhyothemis fuliginosa
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 15:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough, nice article, does not look like copyvio. Hook facts check out, but the ALT0 fact isn't stated clearly in the article. (It is there in Latin, but not in lay people's terms). Image is fine. If this runs without image (and possibly if it runs with image), how about adding "extinct" somewhere in the hook? —Kusma (talk) 11:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also seems that the QPQ has been already used at Template:Did you know nominations/Plecia canadensis; could you provide another one? —Kusma (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Kusma: I do not mind having extinct added, and have updated Alt0 accordingly. Also my apologies for the already used QPQ. Here is a alternate one!--Kevmin § 15:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing a new qpq. Happy to approve, but you could consider using the word "beech" more often in the article. —Kusma (talk) 15:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Kusma: I do not mind having extinct added, and have updated Alt0 accordingly. Also my apologies for the already used QPQ. Here is a alternate one!--Kevmin § 15:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Promoting the main hook (ALT0) to Prep 5, unfortunately, without the image – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- B-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- B-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- B-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- B-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject Canada's 10,000 Challenge
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- B-Class Eastern Washington task force articles
- Low-importance Eastern Washington task force articles
- Eastern Washington task force articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles