Talk:Fairey Delta 2

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

I have just redirected Fairey FD-2 to this page, and moved some info contained only on that page into this one. However, I am wondering whether Fairey FD-2 might be the better title for this article. I can't find any precedent to say which would be more correct. Nick Moss 01:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, according to my sources (an Aeroplane Monthly article on Peter Twiss in the April 1984 issue), the Fairey Delta 2's designation was written as F.D.2.

Likewise, the earlier Fairey Delta 1 was written as F.D.1.

I'm not sure of the correctness of the FD-2 name but I won't change it as there's a chance it may come from a more accurate source, although I think that's unlikely. Ian Dunster 12:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi my grandad worked on the fd2 wg774 while it was in farnborough but i dont know mutch about it would be interesting if anyone could fill me in on this

Sam

Comparable aircraft

Aren't at least the Saab 35 Draken, possibly also the Convair F-102 Delta Dagger/F-106 Delta Dart or Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21/Chengdu J-7 appropriate comparable aircrafts? The 35 is rather similar (and a common comparison to the Dassault_Mirage_III), and it's "210" version was a dedicated concept test aircraft. --Rootmoose (talk) 10:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tailless aircraft?

The body text states that the Fairey Delta 2 is a Tailless aircraft, yet the images associated with the article show a tail, is this correct? Best Regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article on tailless aircraft explains that the term applies to a type with no horizontal stabiliser (tailplane or foreplane), though it may have a fin and rudder. The FD2 is of this type. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the drawing the infobox image?

The infobox displays a drawing of the Fairey Delta 2, why not use an image in the article? Just wondering if this is on purpose. A-37Dragonfly (talk) 23:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]