Talk:Falcon 9 flight 10

Article rationale

This article was created due to notablility of the launch, with is a bit unusual in spaceflight articles, where usually the satellite (or the primary satellite controls the name of the article. The reason is that this particular launch is notable, both for its many scrubs/delays, as well as for the booster recovery that is considered more likely on this third test of the controlled-descent over-ocean flight test and simulated landing of the booster.

Also, as of right now, no OG2 Mission 1 article has been created for the satellite constellation by any editor, and editors of the satellite articles often express opinions that launch vehicle and launch details not be included in those articles. N2e (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Falcon 9 Flight 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911172414/http://spaceflightnow.com/tracking/index.html to http://spaceflightnow.com/tracking/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715012544/http://new.livestream.com/spacex/events/2980259/statuses/54436672 to http://new.livestream.com/spacex/events/2980259/statuses/54436672

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)