Jump to content

Talk:Fanning Raid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No Leipzig

[edit]

Leipzig was not involved in the operation - she didn't join von Spee's squadron until 15 October. See the relevant articles on Nuernberg and Leipzig for details. Parsecboy (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This contradicts two of the provided sources.Catlemur (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources are low-quality and obviously wrong. Leipzig was cruising off the coast of Mexico at the time. Spee sent Nuernberg and the collier Titania to Fanning. Again, please see both of the articles linked above, where they are thoroughly cited with academic historians. Parsecboy (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fanning Raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]