Talk:Faris al-Zahrani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Faris az-Zahrani's piece in Sawt al-Jihad (meaning the original Sawt al-Jihad in KSA) was mainly a rebuke against the Wahhabi cleric Safar Al-Hawali and al-Jazeera.

209.121.88.198 (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faris al-Zahrani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of neutrality[edit]

I find the article as currently displayed to contain several occurrences of non-neutral speech (in particular the adjective "important" used to refer to the literary production of the article's subject) as well as phrases indicating that the contributor speaks from an ideological point of view. Although I assume good faith, it would be well for someone to vet the article. As I am not logged into Wikipedia and lack the authority to undo changes, and since I also think that this problem affects the whole entry, I suggest a veteran contributor check it. 2A01:CB04:48E:AD00:D928:65C6:79CD:A2FC (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]