Talk:Fat Bottomed Girls
![]() | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fat Bottomed Girls article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cover
[edit]Who's that girl riding the bike? 21:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Article
[edit]The article says that the song is sung by May in the studio, wich is horribly wrong. What a mistake.--85.224.81.244 18:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree. Fucking disgrace that this was allowed to happen. I've changed it, don't worry.--Gustav Lindwall 18:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Now it says Brian May sang lead on the chorus. Huw Powell (talk) 03:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
The description of open tuning is inaccurate. It is tuned to Drop-D, which is a drop tuning, not an "open" tuning. An example open tuning would be Led Zeppelin's Bron Yr Stomp See the following --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guitar_tunings Moxell1 (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Trivia section
[edit]I only see 1 statement that is that relevant.....who cares what programmes have used it? Only the controversy related comment seems worthy of the article. Simon Acreman 21:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Revised
[edit]I rewrote the POV statement regarding axioms as "serious" subjects. The current version should more adequately convey a neutral standpoint. Cheers. --Coldbourne (talk) 03:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Queen Bicycle Race1.png
[edit]The image Image:Queen Bicycle Race1.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Cover versions?
[edit]The article states there are numerous cover versions, but it's a dead link. Has that section been removed or just overlooked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.68.116 (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fat Bottomed Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222134832/http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19790113.html to http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19790113.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hard rock
[edit]Marcos FTO Has added Hard rock to the genre section w/o discussion or consensus. Posting here to seek consensus of other page watchers. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Genres
[edit]Fat Bottomed Girls is a glam rock song (mainly because of his lyrics, obvious), and have hard rock guitars too.[1][2] Marcos FTO (talk) 24 November 2018.
References
- ^ Dean, Maury (1 January 2003). Rock and Roll: Gold Rush. Algora Publishing. p. 459. ISBN 978-0-87586-227-9.
- ^ "Bicycle Race - Queen Song Info AllMusic". AllMusic. Retrieved November 25, 2018.
...and the hard-rocking 'Fat Bottomed Girls.'
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help)
- Please review WP:STABLE your edit has been reverted again, do not add it back until a consensus is reached. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Fat Bottomed Girls is clearly a hard rock song, is heavy like a hard rock song. The original genres are "glam rock" and "hard rock", but an anonymous (or nearly a vandal) has removed "Glam rock", and now i'm just rescuing the original genres (with sources). I don't want to start a discussion, I only want to put one more genre (which is referenced and correct). Original old version, Anonymous change Marcos FTO (talk) 01:59, 25 November 2018.
- @Marcos FTO: The discussion is not about if it's sourced or not, it's about do the page watchers think the source is reliable enough for inclusion. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: I understand. But many other wiki pages use AllMusic as a source. So if somebody (the page watchers) disagree with me, talk here in the Talk Page, right? (Marcos FTO) 17:02, 28 November 2018
- Yes. thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: I understand. But many other wiki pages use AllMusic as a source. So if somebody (the page watchers) disagree with me, talk here in the Talk Page, right? (Marcos FTO) 17:02, 28 November 2018
- @FlightTime: So... can I put the genre now? Remembering: "If somebody (the page watchers) disagree with me, talk here in the Talk Page". (Marcos FTO) 17:13, 28 November 2018
- No. Consensus needs to be reached before the contested material is included. The article is not going anywhere, whats the rush. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: So... can I put the genre now? Remembering: "If somebody (the page watchers) disagree with me, talk here in the Talk Page". (Marcos FTO) 17:13, 28 November 2018
- @FlightTime: When the "consensus" is reached? I still don't understand this. What is this "consensus"? (Marcos FTO) 28 November 2018
- See WP:Consensus and please also review Help:Talk pages - FlightTime (open channel) 17:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: When the "consensus" is reached? I still don't understand this. What is this "consensus"? (Marcos FTO) 28 November 2018
- @FlightTime: So we are waiting for a "third opinion"? --Marcos FTO (talk) 17:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Did you review the link I gave you above ? - FlightTime (open channel) 17:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: So we are waiting for a "third opinion"? --Marcos FTO (talk) 17:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: I still don't know what you want, I already show my arguments, but the "consensus" still not reached. I'm sorry, but can't understand these "consensus". --Marcos FTO (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Marcos FTO: Look, I am not spending all day going back and forth with you. Every question you have asked is explained here WP:Consensus READ IT. Have a nice day. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)