Jump to content

Talk:Federal Civil Defense Administration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This page is largely incorrect. The FCDA was actually created to protect the civilian populace, but was denied the funding needed to build its proposed public shelters. Continuity-of-government functions were the responsibility of another organization, the Office of Defense Mobilization. In 1958 the FCDA and the ODM were merged into a single organization, the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization. I believe that the Denton shelter was actually built after this merger. The famous backyard fallout shelter campaign was largely conducted by the OCDM- while home shelters appeared in FCDA materials in the early 1950s, they only became the focus of civil defense in 1958, with the appearance of the handbook "The Family Fallout Shelter." A few scholarly monographs have been written in recent years on these topics, including Laura McEnaney's Civil Defense Begins at Home. The best brief summary I've seen of the FCDA's history was in a 1962 book titled Civil Defense: Planning for Survival and Recovery, by Donald W. Mitchell. This page should be completely rewritten using these sources.

Disband?

[edit]

When was the FCDA disbanded (or defunded or whatever you call it)? I assume it isn't still active. Federal Civil Defense Administration implies this administration, with the same initials, was ended in 1958. RJFJR (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWII

[edit]

In researching Sephardic Bikur Holim Congregation, I ran across a reference to a "Civil Defense Administration" during World War II and was actually surprised to find that a redlink. Would there have been a similarly named operation during the war (maybe at state level)? - Jmabel | Talk 05:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some additional possible sources

[edit]

Internet searches for the book by Mitchell mentioned above brought up the following other sources, which may be reliable enough to be used (and cited).

Hopefully these sources may be of some help. -- 63.251.123.2 (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]