Talk:Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 01:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

It is now time for another epicgenius (talk · contribs) good article review. As per usual, comments will be made once I've read the article and checked its sources. 01:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments:

• Would be nice to make the last few general references inline, but not required for GA-class I now realize these are shortened footnotes for books, no further work is needed by epicgenius here.
• All images are properly licensed, and there is a fair number of images.
• Earwig report came up clean
• No self published sources
• Many inaccessible sources

• Article meets all basic criteria, so I will be passing it. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 03:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.