Jump to content

Talk:Federation Tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What language is this article supposed to be?

in the Emporis.com website the tower call'd vostok

Moscow, Russia is considered to be in Europe?

Europe --Sascha. 02:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added russian site with renderings etc. 213.154.206.227 08:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

32nd floor??? For 2 months??? They can end building at least in 2020! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.138.70.55 (talk) 14:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tower C

[edit]

Where is this designation coming from? On the official site there is no mentioning of a "third tower".--Sascha. 09:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once there was a mention. It was called C. Elk Salmon 11:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But not any more? And it is stays stated there that the complex consists of two, not three, towers. I think we should find another wording for that thing in the middle.--Sascha. 17:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How about the central spire?--Sascha. 10:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not central. It is part of Tower A as it's makes full structural complex height. Spire couldn't be used alone as it's not a building, while the spire is a part of architecture and structure. Its height should have to be included to Tower A. Elk Salmon 12:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'am just looking how English-speaking professionals call it and see only the (central) spire, that's why I'm proposing to call it that. This is how one American company (involved in the construction of the F.) refers to it:
A 430-meter stiletto-like central spire connects these two sail-shaped buildings.
And this is from the BBC: The tower will soar to 340 metres (1,115 feet), attached to a stiletto-like central spire. There will be a neighboring 53-storey tower.
"Architectural Record": Two asymmetrical glass towers will stand on a stylobate which also supports a centrally positioned spire perforated by elevator shafts. The antenna atop the spire rises to the height of 1,425 feet. The towers will contain 84 and 57 floors each.
So it's linguistically and technically correct, for such an unusual building. Tower C is not. Tchoban himself calls the central thing Antenna in German, but that is, well, German, not English.
--Sascha. 13:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He could call it as he want. But technically it should have to be stuck to a building. The spire is an architectural part of the complex and it couldn't disappear. It's not a mast/antenna! Elk Salmon 22:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confused...

[edit]

Is there any word as to why construction is stopped? Or is that just because it is night time right now, and they're starting again in the morning? --SteelersFanUK06 HereWeGo2010! 00:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Federation Tower 10-2011.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Federation Tower 10-2011.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Federation Tower 10-2011.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A 509 m skyscraper or not?

[edit]

There are no references in the article so it is hard to tell. However, I think there are two skyscrapers: The under construction 360 m, 93 storey Vostok Tower; and the already completed 242 m, 63 storey Zapad Tower. And between them, partially supported by both of the skyscrapers, is a 509 m observation tower also under construction. When completed, Vostok Tower might qualify as the tallest building in Europe, but the observation tower is shorter then the similar purposed Ostankino Tower. That is what the CTBUH suggests, and therefore implying that the observation tower does not have enough fully occupied floors to qualify as a skyscraper (see the definitions here).

Or is it three skyscrapers? Astronaut (talk) 18:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federation Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]