Jump to content

Talk:Feed sack dress

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thank you

[edit]

tweeted here Victuallers (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victuallers, ooooh, way cool! --valereee (talk) 21:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk05:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feed sack dress in the collection of the Smithsonian
Feed sack dress in the collection of the Smithsonian
  • ... that during WWII it was estimated that 3 million US women and children were wearing clothing made from feed sacks (example pictured) at any given point in time? Source: multiple sources at article sentence

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 21:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • GTG, but please make things easier for reviewers in future! Fascinating stuff! New & long enough, seems neutral & well-written. Earwig only finds names & quotes. Pic ok to use, QPQ done. Hook eventually verified, after a good deal of reading - please give quotes in future, which is easily done. I couldn't see it in the very long first ref at the sentence (Vogelsang), so why is that there? Also please specify when you moved it to mainspace so I don't have to look through all the history, but that's now done. Johnbod (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnbod, hey, sorry...usually I do link to and quote specific sources, but this one felt like it didn't need it so much. I'll not make that assumption in future, thanks! And thanks for the review! :) --valereee (talk) 20:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]