Talk:Felix Römer/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Catrìona (talk · contribs) 08:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this article as well. Catrìona (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

• were murdered by regular troops (not the SS) by May 1942 Recommend alternate phrasing, and clarify that they were shot after surrender was accepted. Perhaps "... were shot by Wehrmacht (not SS) units after their surrender was accepted." The emphasis on not the SS comes across as slightly POV.

Revised. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

• sporadic objections to the order were not fundamental I think this could be clarified. By "fundamental" you mean "in principle", "principled", "humanitarian" or due to respect for the rule of law, but I'm not sure which.

Revised. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

• believed in a victory for even longer is "even" necessary here?

Removed. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

• Fix harv errors with Staas and Romer, classified as unused sources.

Moved to further reading. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed