Talk:Female condom/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

How do I use it?

This article lacks any history, and seems to discuss none of the negative aspects.

How do I use it?

You guys (yes, you!) should add a section explaining how to use it. I don't have a clue of how to use that bag. Maybe no one has...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.79.33.145 (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2007

The smaller ring is inserted into the vagina. The larger ring prevents the entire device from slipping inside. That might be able to be worked into the article, but Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Lyrl^Talk _C 23:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Shouldn't it have all of the significant information about something? I think how to use it is very significant when it comes to condoms. The male condom version even has this little drawning showing how to use it. Why is female condom lacking it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.79.33.145 (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I thought this was originally developed for gay male anal sex. Does anyone know for sure and have information on this topic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.93.76 (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Sir . Anal sex to pregnant...???? ROSHAN KARKI RK 007 (talk) 07:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Where do I get it?

Say I'd like to try out the latex version of the female condom. Is there any place at all in Europe to get it from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.221.155.29 (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC) the blow job part of florence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.217.102 (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

FC?

I have no idea what this FC1, FC2 is, or why it appears to be taken for granted in several sections. If this is a brand, the article should be revised to be brand-neutral.rubah (talk) 06:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

cissexist

I feel like the massive cissexism of the name "female condom" should be addressed in the article. A) not everyone with a vagina is female; B) people use it anally; C) it promotes the idea that women must be receptive/bottoms/be penetrated in order to have sex.

I know many people who would much prefer that it be renamed the "receptive condom"

It seems to be common to refer to is as an internal condom now. 98.179.184.17 (talk) 20:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Images

Compared to the explicitness of the condom article, this one is definitely lacking in images. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 16:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Female condom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Female condom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905112142/http://www.acponline.org/acp_press/fenway/how-to-put-on-a-female-condom-for-anal-sex.pdf to http://www.acponline.org/acp_press/fenway/how-to-put-on-a-female-condom-for-anal-sex.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Pasante Female Condom

Pasante Female Condom is now not mentioned in this Wikipedia article.

Is it sold under a different brand name in some countries? Is some competing brands practically the same product so same user instructions would be valid for both products?

https://pasante.com/products/non-latex-female-condom-3-pack

Although the site suffix is .com, the is UK site and the prices are in £. I have no idea what is the equivalent product or brand in USA if there is one.

--ee1518 (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)