Talk:Fenerbahçe Ülker

Notable Players

I think most of the players in the notable players section is unneccesary as most of them played just one season and achieved nothing with the team. For example bernard king and sylvester gray are not one of the players that fans could remember. However, henry turner, dallas comegys, kaspars kambala, mitch smith are the players that gets interest and be succesful in our team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scragnothh (talk • contribs) 20:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Fenerbahçe is not successor of Ülkerspor

Fenerbahçe had an sponsor deal with Ülker group, not with Ülkerspor. Fenerbahçe S.K. was founded in 1907, long long before Ülkerspor. Fenerbahçe and Ülkerspor played against each other for years. It is useless to have the history nor honours of Ülkerspor in this page. Those interested may take a look at Ülkerspor page.

Alpella is successor of Ülkerspor...

• https://www.tblstat.net/team/2

And the name of the team is not "Fenerbahçe Ülkerspor". No more Ülkerspor left, it is "Fenerbahçe Ülker".

Alex20fb (talk) 01:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Did you visit the page on euroleague.net?

Hey friend (Alex20fb) please visit the page in external links summary, about euroleague.net. Then tell me if i am wrong about the clubs history.

And when the page opened about the club, it was "Fenerbahçe Ülkerspor".

Gokhantig (talk) 09:57, 02 December 2007 (UTC)

I guess you mean this page: http://www.euroleague.net/main/teams/showteam?clubcode=ULK

about that link: 1) It is not "fenerbahce ulkerspor", it is "fenerbahce ulker" 2) by checking the Trophy Case you'll see that there are only two league titles (which means that they don't count ulkerspors 4 titles)

history of ulkerspor before the sponsorship, is not part of fenerbahce history... maybe in year 2015, the name of the club may be "fenerbahce efes", it doesn't matter... fenerbahce is fenerbahce... thats all... --Alex20fb 16:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Fenerbahçe.svg

The image Image:Fenerbahçe.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)