Talk:Fern Communications

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Sharonroe (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the piece is accurate and based on fact. The articles cited are all verifiable and published by a number of authoritative oil and gas trade magazines dedicated to the industry and are objective in their descriptions of the business and the significance of its services and products.

The entry does not promote the company, but cites industry publications to describe what it does and why it is significant within the oil services industry. This business, based on these sources, should be considered noteworthy. I would appreciate clarification as to why it would not be considered so.

Any suggestions for changes in style and wording are welcome and should be incorporated immediately.

This is an objectively written entry that uses standard industry publications to demonstrate the significance of the company and its products.

OK you want a shot I'll give you a shot. I've declined the speedy and have nominated the article for deletion. The discussion is here. You are welcome to participate in the discussion and you have 7 days to convince us that the article should be kept. I strongly suggest that you read WP:CORP. To be notable a corporation has to do more then exist. It has to have media coverage outside of insider trade publications. Also, while not a policy or guideline you might also want to read WP:B2B. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fern Communications Ltd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]