Talk:Final Fantasy Chronicles

Erroneous copied text?

Some of the text on this page is copied directly from the Final Fantasy Anthology page, leading to some nonsense in the second-to-last paragraph in the first section:

"Final Fantasy Chronicles didn't have a seemingly endless supply..." "The game went quickly out of print, however, especially as Final Fantasy Chronicles was released..." (paraphrases)

Can this be revised or removed?

Arkaaito 17:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Failed GA

This article has failed the GA noms, due as it lack to talk more about what bonus features this game includes. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Tarret 14:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Asked for review :) Judgesurreal777 01:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

GA review

The development section mentions bonus features as existing. The reviewer asks for expansion on what those bonus features were. While the original review seems woefully inadequate, especially since it gives no guidance as to how to actually make this article a GA, the article still should be failed based on the following fixes needed:

• Criteria 2 (referencing and accuracy): Last paragraph of "reception" is unreferenced.
• Criteria 3 (broadness): This is the real problem. The article teases content, but says very little. It mentions changes from earlier releases, without delving into what those changes were. It mentions bonus features, but never mentions what they were. While a synopsis of the entire game is in no way needed, some explanation of the game's features and game play is probably needed. We don't want the entire game runthough, but we should get SOME sense of what the game is and how it is played. See WP:FICT for more ideas on how to expand this article.

• This GA failure of this article has been endorsed per the now archived Good article review. IvoShandor 12:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

2nd GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

This article looks fine and has passed every aspect of the GA list. If anyone has a problem/comment/question, please reply to this. If not, I will award it GA status in awhile. INFORMATION CENTER (T • C) 19:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Translation differences

The script of the PSOne version of FF4 is a little different from the SNES version. Was there some sort of redoing of the translation or whatever? 75.107.169.62 (talk) 18:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Reference material

Found this: Game Informer review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Fantasy Chronicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/60eLEcdUY?url=http://psx.ign.com/articles/166/166322p1.html to http://psx.ign.com/articles/166/166322p1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Fantasy Chronicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67Ev2fxvB?url=http://www.gaming-age.com/404.html to http://www.gaming-age.com/cgi-bin/reviews/review.pl?sys=psx&game=ffc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)