Talk:Final Fantasy Type-0 HD/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this. Basically I might change my style of reviews now, so I'll see how it goes with this one. JAGUAR  21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "while the Steam port was released in August 2015" - link game port

   "and performed on bass guitar and drums respectively" - comma needed

   "The Blu-ray album reached #189 in the Oricon charts, and remained for one week" - link this to the Japanese charts

   "The album, and music in general, have received positive comments from music critics and reviewers of the game" - if you plan on taking this to FA, I'd recommend fleshing out the critics' comments

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail for a recently discovered extra-solar object

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable, no edit warring

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images used

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This article meets the criteria so I am happy to promote it. JAGUAR  22:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)