Jump to content

Talk:Final Resolution (2005)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleFinal Resolution (2005) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 12, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Final Resolution (2005)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Review by SGGH ping!:

  • The article does not fail any of the quickfail criteria.
  • The article is well written.
  • The sources are reliable, there are inline citations. None of the ref tags are defective. The references are difficult to verifty, but the footnotes are suitable.
  • The article has a broad coverage suitable to the topic.
  • The article has no POV problems.
  • The article has no edit warring problems.
  • The images are suitable, are free or have suitable fair use rationales.

Good work. Passed. SGGH ping! 13:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Resolution (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]