Talk:Fineness ratio

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fineness ratio. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fineness ratio at the Reference desk.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Theory Behind "Ideal Fineness Ratio"[edit]

I would like to see a section on why the ideal fineness ratio is 3 to 4. Thanks very much. =) 75.18.124.152 (talk) 07:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All we need is references and it can be added. Do you know of any? - Ahunt (talk) 11:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I might be a little bit late but I hope this helps. --TerrainAhead (talk) 13:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good find on that ref. It is a good thing that the article doesn't say that the ideal fineness ratio is 3 to 4, as the ref makes it clear that the subject is more complex than that. Let me see if I can add a bit from the ref. - Ahunt (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Ahunt (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

:-) --TerrainAhead (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]