Talk:Finite morphism

Finite => projective[edit]

This is true when projectivity is defined as in EGA II, § 5.5. I don't think finiteness implies projectivity in the stronger sense given in Hartshorne. Liu (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Split the "morphism of finite type" section[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as split: No opposition after 4 years. Felix QW (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think "finite morphisms" and "morphisms of finite type" are quite different notions, and the latter is important enough to deserve its own article. So I suggest the section be split. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyxty (talk • contribs) 07:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.