Talk:Fionna and Cake (episode)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: New Age Retro Hippie (talk · contribs) 12:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Starting. Please give me some time as I am busy with other articles and real life; however, I should have this assessed in (worst case scenario) about a week's time. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 12:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
I noticed a number of grammatical errors and (on rare occasions) typos. The most glaring issue was the overuse of commas (instead of - for example - parenthesis or hyphens). I've gone through and given it a copyedit so grammar issues should be relatively fine.
Obviously fair use is not an issue as the article does not include anything of the sort. I do wonder if the article could sustain such an image however.
A problem I found in the external links checker provided in this page is a link that appears inaccessible as well as some trivial errors w/ links. You should be able to see them by using the el checker (the offending link is marked by blue).
A fair problem I have is the overuse of quotations. It's frowned upon to use them in excess like this; the reception should be a summary of what they said and should use quotations only when necessary. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 06:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I tried to cut down on the use of quotations. How does it look now? The reason the one link is unavailable is that it only accessible through a database. That's why the citation has the "(subscription required)" tag at the end of it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- While the effort put forward is nice, it still feels as though the quoting is in excess. I would appreciate it if you gave it another go through - summarize as much of the critics' opinions as possible - and perhaps even request another pair of eyes to look it over (ideally someone who's familiar with the episode). - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 03:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I will. Can you give me a couple more days? I'm in the middle of finals right now. :P --Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry about the delay. I will provide a looksie soon. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 00:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- After reviewing the changed content, I am satisfied that it now qualifies for GA status. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 11:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry about the delay. I will provide a looksie soon. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 00:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I will. Can you give me a couple more days? I'm in the middle of finals right now. :P --Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- While the effort put forward is nice, it still feels as though the quoting is in excess. I would appreciate it if you gave it another go through - summarize as much of the critics' opinions as possible - and perhaps even request another pair of eyes to look it over (ideally someone who's familiar with the episode). - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 03:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)