Talk:Fire and movement

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

The article as it is, talks about suppressive fire and not fire and movement. Definately needs some looking into.--Elmeri B. Suokirahvi 11:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This needs some verification and some links to other articles if it is to continue to exist. Not really sure if it should, but not sure enough that I am going to list it for speedy delete. Just needs some looking into.

I've altered this page as best I can. Needs to be looked at by an expert though as I don't have vast knowledge on this subject and have only done bits and pieces (as is evident by lack of links etc.) Hope ive made an improvement on what was here before though. Tom Lavender 0522 (BST) 10 July 2006

Wikified[edit]

Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! A little section formatting, mostly. Added an "expert" tag as requested above. JubalHarshaw 18:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

I am able to cite the majority of the talking points of this page using US Army Field Manuals. I was wondering if that would serve as an acceptable source? as I am no expert on the subject, just an avid reader on the topic. Cowboy357 06:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would be great! MadMaxDog 09:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Merge[edit]

Fire and movement is one of the key principles of warfare, not restricted to being a modern infantry tactic it is also relevant to tank warfare i.e. blitzkreig Historical examples include mongol tactics etc. Although it is currently a stub, further work will make this a full and useful article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bob Hu (talk • contribs) 05:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

-I agree...The term "infantry minor tactics" is used by the Australian military and is synonymous with "Individual Movement Techniques", or the term used by the US military. IMT's refer to the actions of soldiers moving individually, such as high/low crawling, or bounding up using a buddy team. Fire and maneuver is a term used to describe the latter, however it also is used in a much higher context than IMT's would be. Fire and Maneuver is the basic idea of suppression and moving to either break contact, or acheive a more advantageous position in relation to the enemy. It refers to units ranging from buddy teams, all the way up to entire armies.

British Fire and Movement 1914[edit]

The British Regular army used this name for their doctrine in 1914. Basically fast movement supported by accurate field artillery and mutual support by high rates of rifle fire. Was only possible with highly trained professionals. Not sure if this equates to today's US doctrine, as the fire support options available today as far greater than then. So maybe this article needs to cover generality, history and specifics. Rcbutcher 14:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article title - capitalization[edit]

Needs to be "Fire and movement", with a small 'm'. The current style is not appropriate for a generic term. 72.200.151.15 (talk) 16:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --A D Monroe III^(talk) 21:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fire and Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141120012417/http://armypubs.army.mil/doctrine/DR_pubs/dr_a/pdf/fm3_21x8.pdf to http://armypubs.army.mil/doctrine/DR_pubs/dr_a/pdf/fm3_21x8.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]