Talk:Fire service co-responder

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Firefighting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Macwhiz, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 7 November 2010. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Fire Services that do not run as Co-Responders[edit]

Is this section really needed? Samiddon (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Wrcf1 (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Just "Yes" isnt really an answer...? So, why is this section needed? Also, the text for each service that does Co-Respond is just copied between each one.Squirrel684 (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

maybe the section is not needed because it is obvious that they do not. And what else is to say about each service. What do you think i should do???Wrcf1 (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Website[edit]

The FRS Co-Responder schemes dont really have a website, do they? The Retained Firefighters Union doesnt really count as their website. It is just their view on the topic.Samiddon (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No i have removed it Wrcf1 (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First Responders[edit]

The Fire Service run Co-Responder schemes. First Responder schemes are individuals in a community who, when a medical emergency occurs, can be called upon by the ambulance service to provide medical assistance until an ambulance arrives. Whilst this is similar to the role of the Fire Service, in a Co-Responder role, they are different. I propose this is moved back to Fire Service Co-Responders. Squirrel684 (talk) 14:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i have moved it back Wrcf1 (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Humberside[edit]

Can I ask what happened to Humberside Fire and Rescue Service which is missing from the list? Keith D (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the question! Is Humberside a Co-Responder? Squirrel684 (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I cannot answer that point, just noticed its absence from the list. Keith D (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi Humberside Fire and Rescue Service is in the Fire Services that do not run as Co-Responders. Wrcf1 (talk) 23:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emergency Response Unit.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Emergency Response Unit.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Emergency Response Unit.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fire Service Co-Responder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080115190217/http://www.swast.nhs.uk/services/resp_fire.htm to http://www.swast.nhs.uk/services/resp_fire.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]