Talk:First Test, 1948 Ashes series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleFirst Test, 1948 Ashes series is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 24, 2009Good article nomineeListed
January 6, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
April 14, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 19, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Harvey, Barnes, Brown, Johnson, Loxton and Hassett were members of Bradman's Invincibles who won the First, Second and Fourth Ashes series Test matches of 1948 and drew the Third?
Current status: Featured article

Orphaned references in First Test, 1948 Ashes series[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of First Test, 1948 Ashes series's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "surrey":

  • From Sam Loxton with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948: "Surrey v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 2008-12-18.
  • From Ray Lindwall with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948: "Australians in England, 1948". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (1949 ed.). Wisden. pp. 219–220.

Reference named "hantsw":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]