Talk:First metacarpal bone

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Animal anatomy Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fracture stats

″Fractures to the first metacarpal bone account for 30–40% of all hand fractures and 25% of all metacarpal fractures (second to fractures to the fifth metacarpal bone).″ This claim does not make sense. Metacarpal fractures are a subset of hand fractures, right? Therefore the number of metacarpal fractures cannot exceed the number of hand fractures – right? Indeed, if carpal and phalangeal fractures exist at all, then the number of MC fractures must be smaller than the total of all hand fractures. So how can fractures of the first MC account for a third of all hand fractures – the larger set – but only for a quarter of MC fractures – the smaller set?--Mardil (talk) 08:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]