Talk:Flight plan

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

What kind of chart is used for initial flight planning. I'm familiar with approach charts, SIDS, Stars. But what kind of chart is used for planning and plotting the route used

Proposed Re-write

This article currently only provides details of US domestic flight plans, and the 'Flight planning' article merely redirects to this one.

I propose splitting this into three articles, and then expanding each article considerably:

'Flight plan': moderate detail on four types of flight plan, including US domestic, other air traffic control plan, pilot plan with detailed routing and fuel consumption figures, navigation plan for use by onboard navigation computer/automatic pilot.
'Flight planning': general outline of requirements, safety regulations, airway routes, physical constraints, weather and other factors to take into account, etc. plus other optional features of current flight planning systems.
'Flight planning glossary': there at least 80 specialised words or phrases which can be explained. Some of these may already have a separate article, but the bulk only require a sentence or two of explanation and hardly justify a separate article.

I estimate that the above rewrite will take one to two months.

Any comments/suggestions?

Murray Langton 10:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Murray. I propose the section titled SIDS and STARS be retitled Terminal Procedures and also include Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP) which can be used instead of SIDS or STARS. Also, this might be the appropriate place to discuss precision and non-precision approach. Intrepidwerx (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible disambiguation

I was thinking in separate the current Flight Plan article in different articles as follow:

Filled Flight Plan or FPL: Form filled with the information of a flight mainly related to its safety in order to suveil it during its progress (referred in this article)
Operational Flight Plan or OFP: Document used aboard the aircraft, related to the fuel consumption and other data concernin the airline or company.

Ansede88 13:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flight plan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100921203803/http://www.worldairops.com/NAT/ to http://www.worldairops.com/NAT/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related topic

Proposed Re-write

Possible disambiguation

External links modified (January 2018)