Talk:Flip (software)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Flip (software) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the classroom video platform Flip was made free-to-use when acquired by Microsoft in 2018? Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/18/microsoft-acquires-education-start-up-flipgrid.html
- Reviewed:
Created by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 01:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC).
The article is long and new enough. The hook is interesting and supported by a reliable source. No copyvio was observed. But I am not happy with Refs 8 and 9. Per WP:SCHOLARSHIP: "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence." Can you enhance the sourcing please? --Mhhossein talk 12:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: I replaced the thesis with a different journal and added another one that I also came across. - Aoidh (talk) 14:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- alright @Aoidh:, But wait; I don't want to be too meticulous, but when we say "studies" show sth, we need to cite more than one study concluding the same thing or alter the hook so that it does not convey an inaccurate meaning. Let me know your choice. --Mhhossein talk 14:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: I reworded it so that it showed the exact number of studies being referenced. - Aoidh (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Good to go with the proposed hook. --Mhhossein talk 14:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: I reworded it so that it showed the exact number of studies being referenced. - Aoidh (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- alright @Aoidh:, But wait; I don't want to be too meticulous, but when we say "studies" show sth, we need to cite more than one study concluding the same thing or alter the hook so that it does not convey an inaccurate meaning. Let me know your choice. --Mhhossein talk 14:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Microsoft articles
- Mid-importance Microsoft articles
- WikiProject Microsoft articles
- C-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- C-Class education articles
- Mid-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles
- WikiProject Apps
- C-Class apps articles
- Low-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles