Talk:Flocculent spiral galaxy

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 April 2010 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs).

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

{{movereq|flocculent spiral galaxy}}

Flocculent Spiral Galaxy → Flocculent spiral galaxy —

MOS:CAPS, MOS:TITLE

According to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the title of this article should not be capitalized. When it was originally requested at WP:AFC, the title was not capitalized. When it was requested as a speedy at WP:RM, the reasoning was MOS:CAPS.

The speedy move was contested. So here's a full WP:RM.

70.29.208.247 (talk) 01:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Please indicate your position here, with a support for the proposal, or opposition to it, and a rationale for your position.

Support as nominator; other galaxy types are similarly not capitalized. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 01:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support For the reason above. --Extra999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 15:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The search bar ignores cases and capitals. It is unnessisary to change the case--Alpha Quadrant (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support and comment Eh? You shouldn't have reverted an admin move anyway. If you wanted to move it, you should have left it alone and contested it at WP:RM. At any rate, it obviously qualifies under WP:CAPS (not MOS:CAPS). Miracle Pen (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Reply the manual of style says that Celestial bodies should be capitalized when used as a noun. The title of this article is a noun. I did not know that the user who moved the article was an administrator. I noticed that the page had been moved and that the move was unnessisary so I moved it back to its origional title. Sorry if this caused any problems.--Alpha Quadrant (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - What MOS says is that the names of galaxies are proper nouns. "Flocculent spiral galaxy" is not the name of a galaxy; it's the name of a type of galaxy. It's not a proper noun. Miracle Pen (talk) 02:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and User:Miracle Pen. "Flocculent spiral galaxy" is not a proper noun. --emerson7 20:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- comment: recommend speedy close. --emerson7 05:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Use this section for other comments related to the move

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Remove Pinwheel picture?[edit]

The photo of the Pinwheel in the list of examples looks like an excellent instance of a grand-design spiral, not a flocculent one. So what's it doing here? Jmacwiki (talk) 05:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now replaced with M63, which is flocculent. Jmacwiki (talk) 23:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]