Talk:Flutterwave

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Flutterwave.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Reliable source

Articles on Wikipedia only based on reliable sources, if there is no reliable sources, such article should not be placed on Wikipedia in the first place, especially when it could be considered derogatory. In identifying a reliabe source, such source should have an article on Wikipedia. Opelogbon (talk) 08:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Jamiebuba Please show where "Rest of the World" and "Tech Africa" are reliable sources on Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opelogbon (talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

@Opelogbon First, Please DO NOT make any more reverts. Tech Africa may not be on the list of Wikipedia:Reliable sources but it is well recognized and known for good journalism in that region alongside with Business Insider which you all claim are not reliable funny enough all of those sites are on GNEWS. If you have any possible Wikipedia:Conflict of interest with the subject, refrain from editing it. From your contributions it seems all you do is edit pages that have COI or possible PAID traits.

Can you explain why you blanked a whole section on Olugbenga Agboola which was properly sourced? Jamiebuba (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Maybe you should have opened the discussion on the talk page before reversing the edit in the first place. First, Techpoint Africa didnt claim itself as source for the story. You may wish to read the content as well as the guidelines of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. A newspaper can only be a source for article when it is the editorial work of the newspaper and not content lifted on social media without editorial verification. The Business Insider report you cited reported a reaction from the company and not an admission of the rumours on social media. You may wish to read the content of the report. I do not have any Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and like I stated on your page, I created the controversy section for this page. The same unreliable source used in this page was used in Olugbenga Agboola as well, hence the need for the removal. Should you have any Wikipedia:Reliable sources with editorial input, please feel free to make them available and include in the section. If not, the edit will be revert and you may wish to draw the attention of other editors to this.

It is also important to highlight that Techpoint, disputed every allegations in the social media rumour through a fact check. To now use that as a source for the allegation is being inaccurate. I have seen the Wikipedia:RedWarn you issued on my edit and I am happy Wikipedia is an open space for all editors, I will be waiting for you to take action without cause. Thanks. For Your Attention TransporterMan Opelogbon (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Money Laundering subsection deleted

@Mifter The subsection with the title "Money laundering" has been deleted after a report by Bloomberg stated that the Kenyan government had withdrawn the case of money laundering against Flutterwave. Opelogbon (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

@User:Justlettersandnumbers What happens in situations like this when the accuser has withdrawn the case? Won't leaving the allegation feel unfair? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opelogbon (talk • contribs) 10:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

References