Talk:Ford Strikers Riot
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from Ford Strikers Riot appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 18:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- ... that in 1942 Ford Strikers Riot (pictured) won the first Pulitzer Prize for Photography? Source: The first Pulitzer for photography would be awarded to Milton Brooks of the Detroit News in 1942—for his image of UAW strikers savagely beating a strikebreaker.
- ALT1: ... that the Pulitzer jury said Ford Strikers Riot (pictured) is "a brutal picture, it sums up much of the labor history of 1941"? Source: a brutal picture, it sums up much of the labor history of 1941
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/List of WNBA seasons
Moved to mainspace by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ford Strikers Riot; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Almost a slam-dunk. I would just suggest "that the Fort Strikers Riot (pictured) won the first Pulitzer Prize for Photography in 1942?" –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 20:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Vami IV: Thank you for the review. I am ok with the tweak suggestion. I usually leave it to the promotors and prep set gleaners. Bruxton (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Edit conflict
[edit]Hi - sorry, I had made a lot of revisions to the format. Could you please go and re-do your edit? I didn't mean to erase yours, I just didn't know how to save so many changes. peace Billyshiverstick (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
That statement is not, "clearly cited in the body".
[edit]@Smuckola "It has been called a portrayal of the struggle in America between capital and labor." is not, "clearly cited in the body". If it is, then clearly cite behind the statement. MEHAFAHS (talk) 05:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @MEHAFAHS: What on earth are you talking about? It's the last sentence in the article (WP:LEADCITE). Stop abusing the term "disruptive editing" or you'll get yourself a warning. I didn't write any of these ideas whatsoever, just minor copy editing. It's just that I can read! So read it, and revert your edit. — Smuckola(talk) 06:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oh no, a warning? How will I continue to live peacefully? MEHAFAHS (talk) 06:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- C-Class Photography articles
- Unknown-importance Photography articles
- C-Class History of photography articles
- WikiProject Photography articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Unknown-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class organized labour articles
- Unknown-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles