Talk:Forest Hills, Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions for Sections to be Added

History, including first KDKA Radio broadcast, Mining, trolleys
Separate section detailing elected officials
Section describing form of government
Parks and recreation
Education
Businesses
Notable people and media references (if there are any)
Climate

Summary of my May 2011 Updates

Added historical populations from the NHGIS

I updated the settlement info box to the newer template, as well as updated the references to use the < ref> tags. There is still a bit of a travel guide feel to the article, which could use some work. I also think if we can get more substance into the article, we could more the demographic information into the info box, as it is just a paragraph of numbers.nChanq (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added some information, but I'd like to see more. A good goal would be to get this article up to the same quality as the Braddock article. nChanq (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other Discussion

The last part of this page needs cleaned up. It sounds like it is from a brochure from the borough manager's office.nChanq (talk) 00:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to update this page to provide a resource for those considering moving to our beautiful Borough. PLEASE do not erase these additions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.203.102 (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the newer additions add to the "brochure" problem. Please stick to the encyclopedia-style tone; not only does the brochure tone not meet Wikipedia's standards, but it also makes it sounds like we are desperate to attract people to the area with the cheesy descriptions. --nChanq (talk) 08:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Forest Hills, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019235623/http://www.census.gov:80/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012-3.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012-3.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]