Talk:Fort Mitchell, Nebraska

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Nebraska Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).

location[edit]

I was trying to find coordinates for the article. This site put it at 1/2 mile south of intersection of 92 and 29 and east of Mitchell. That does not appear to matchup with the location your reference has. over and out. GloverEpp (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Waymark site shows where it is on a Google map. Its the same place, just discribed relative to Scottsbluff which is nearer than Mitchell. The Waymark site has far better location info and historic detail based on the official historical society marker.Asiaticus (talk) 21:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]