Jump to content

Talk:Fort St. George (Chennai)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yes, split it because now there is another fort with that name listed. Bubba73 07:33, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

Added a page and put some basic information. Request your help in expanding it.--Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan 05:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barren Land?

[edit]

This is a dubious statement, since it is well documented that the villages of Madraspatnam and Chennapatnam already existed in the area, which was far from barren -having been an arena for trade from the time of the Phoenicians to the Portuguese, before the British arrived. (Azariahmoreno 03:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

File:Fort St. George, Chennai 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Fort St. George, Chennai 2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 21 August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is an upside down picture

[edit]

The 4th picture in the body of the article is inverted. Someone who knows how should correct this :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.100.17 (talk) 12:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fort St. George, India. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]