Jump to content

Talk:Fot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fotr or fótr?

[edit]

Which is the proper normalization? I don't find reference to either being used as a name, but Fótr seems more reasonable, being an existing word. The original copy being in runes allows for the dropping of length even in romanizations, so that without explicit mention or other instances of the name to go by one can't be entirely sure. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]