Talk:Four World Trade Center

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles

Skyscrapers

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles

New York City

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles

Untitled[edit]

The number of floores will be 72 and not 64 !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.75.114.154 (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, this is bad[edit]

Are we live-blogging the construction's progress or are we writing an encyclopedia? I bet we could cut this poor thing down to a single paragraph. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 03:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:4 WTC.png Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:4 WTC.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FourWTCrendering.png Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:FourWTCrendering.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:4wtcrender.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:4wtcrender.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WorldTradeCenter4(Vision)USA, New York City.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:WorldTradeCenter4(Vision)USA, New York City.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

Per the WTC site [1]], only One World Trade Center is spelled out. 7 World Trade Center correctly uses the numeral, and I've boldly moved 2 World Trade Center to the numeral. Since this article has a more substantial history, I'm raising the issue here rather than making a bold move. Acroterion (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Four World Trade Center → 4 World Trade Center – Per the building owner's site, the building name uses a numeral Fitnr 21:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Fitnr 21:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the buildings' own web site. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per conventions with counting numerals: one, two, three... nine, ten, 11. The original name is okay, but the article 10th Avenue (IRT Flushing Line) redirects to Tenth Avenue (IRT Flushing Line) for the same reason. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 23:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The WTC building names are vanity addresses, so the numerals are akin to address numbers, which don't get spelled out, no matter how large. Fitnr 00:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the buildings' own web site. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The buildings' own web site counts for very little, see WP:official names. Andrewa (talk) 02:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This Ngram isn't much to go on, but it's good enough for me combined with the official usage. --BDD (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Weak) Oppose- "4" is good enough as a redirect. Many sources use "Four" and "4", but there's no such thing as "Ninety-Nine World Trade Center" or "99 World Trade Center". There should be a multi-page move request. George Ho (talk) 17:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Building Status[edit]

Four World Trade Center's building status in the infobox was changed from Complete to Open Publically, Finishing on Exterior Walls by IP Address 72.66.2.121 at 19:42 (UTC) on 4 November 2014. This edit should be reverted back to Complete because the exterior walls are finished and the building was completed in November 2013. If this is not the case, this edit needs a citation ASAP. Cookie Monster (talk) 02:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]