Talk:Framework for authentic intellectual work

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey Stacy!

Great work so far :) You seemed to have hit on all the aspects of AIW. Here is what I saw in terms of possible changes and/or additions: 1.) Put the title of the article in bold as your first words 2.) Link your references 3.) Need a references and resource list 4.) Maybe want to mention who developed AIW and where it came from in the background section at the beginning right away. People may want to know where this came from when first reading; mention some names 5). Put the standards and scoring sections in bold like headings so they stand out more 6.) Maybe develop the challenges section a bit more; there was only one sentence 7.) Maybe add a section for related systems of evaluation like Charlotte Danielson and then link it to Heidi's page? You don't have to go into depth, but just mention the system or other systems and link them 8.) There are no outer links to other pages. So, this is what I saw. You can take it or leave it :) I think you have done a nice job and are close to being done! :)Hirsca (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AIW[edit]

Hi Satcy, This is a really good start of your article. I like that you have linked out to the other Wiki pages. The structure of the paper is quite logical and you touch on all the points.

One suggestion is that you have numbering in your paper like (2) (11) what does this mean?

In the Standards and scoring section rubrics, your sub sections are labelled as Standards and Scoring Rubrics for Instruction, does it make more sense to change them to Instruction, Assignments etc. Also, you might want to link out to Charlotte Danielson's page (by Heidi) and Educator Effectiveness (by Katie Schmit).

I hope you find these comments useful. Thanks, Trawat (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stacy, I think your article looks great! It is easy to read and understand. The introduction seems very strong. You mention the standards which are, of course, very important. I was wondering though if you could perhaps explain them a little more-in other words develop instead of just having a list. Also, you mention the challenges to implementation, what about some real-life examples or schools actually using it??? Just some observations, but overall I think it looks fantastic. HeidiBiancat

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Framework for authentic intellectual work. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Framework_for_authentic_intellectual_work&oldid=1167816361"