Jump to content

Talk:François Sagat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Age

[edit]

I Translate this article to portuguese and i realized some mistakes about his age.His 31 age, but the article says tha his first porn movie was made when he was 35. How it can happens? --Willy oath (talk) 18:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I guess WP is now Pornopedia since links containing pornographic images and advertisements for videos that require age verification are allowed...and trying to remove these in order to have a more encyclopedic article results in reverts by administrators? Most of the articles found under List of male performers in gay porn films contain links to full-frontal porn sites and other advertisements and I'm trying to grasp WP policy in regards to this article and others. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is certainly something wrong with living Porn Stars getting a page of their own on Wikipedia... Especially with links to their MySpace profile in the Links section. I don't think this article really has a place on Wikipedia because pornographers are not necessarily noteworthy as individuals on their own accord. Their various scandals and promotions are mostly self-induced and not really of much interest to the general public. I can only think of 3 or 4 living Pornographers who are noteable enough (or interesting enough) to have a wikipedia page.

People like Hugh Hefner, Chi Chi LaRue, Betty Page, Pamela Anderson, Jeff Stryker and Ron Jeremy are fine (because they are widely known outside of their niche)... but not just everyone who has done a pornographic film should get a wiki page. 98.211.129.152 (talk) 08:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retired?

[edit]

This is for whoever wrote the statement of his retirement? Is there any links to the news of his retirement or is this another unspotted hoax? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iviave (talkcontribs) 04:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual orientation

[edit]

If Francois is gay instead of bi, then can someone please explain to me the video going around of him doing some major face sucking with the blonde chick? Looks to me like he was quite enjoying himself.

Thanks, Chpoof (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chpoof (talkcontribs) 13:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it seems like Francois is bisexual since he does bisexual scenes in porn and enjoys sex with women and has a sexual attraction to the female gender. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.105.41 (talk) 04:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone of you know what acting is? Or you think only non-porn is acting? Dollvalley (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe in this guy's homosexuality at all, not a little bit. He may say he's gay to fool the suckers who consume his porn, but he does not fool me at all If he was gay, why would he kiss the woman with as much passion as he has in a Youtube video? 189.115.186.249 (talk) 16:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you have no clue, gay porn actor say they are straight to sell more as a straight man is more attractive to many gay people. he is gay. at the most you can define him bisexual for pay --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He Is secretly bisexual he been liking naked pictures of women on his Twitter account and he recently did a straight porno movie Kin2233 (talk) 05:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Homme Au Bain

[edit]

Why isn't there a mention of his latest movie "Homme Au Bain" which is even competing in a mainstream movie festival and co-starring Chiara Mastroianni? Dollvalley (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on François Sagat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on François Sagat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

doubts

[edit]

isn't this bio too poorly sourced? most of the links are dead links or interviews himself gave. pluse, I find it way too much celebrative, the article is moreover written as a press release for him--see the many adjectives, the unnecessary photos, etc. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 07:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]