Talk:Fran Folnegović/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 00:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042, just pinging you in case this slipped your mind. No particular rush otherwise. Cheers Tomobe03 (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry I completely forgot about this. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The images are all public domain and have captions do the article passes criteria 6. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There hasn't been any edit warring. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to cover all major aspects and is focused. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems neutral enough and Earwig found no copyright violations. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:55, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]