Talk:Francis Manners, 6th Earl of Rutland

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parish web site[edit]

The article currently contains this quote:

One of the most important English witchcraft cases took place in Bottesford and the Vale of Belvoir in 1618 when Francis Manners, sixth Earl of Rutland accused three local women, Joan, Phillipa and Margaret Flower of murdering his two sons, Henry and Francis, by witchcraft. The case is commemorated on the Earl's tomb in St. Mary's Church, Bottesford, part of his tomb inscription reading: "In 1608 he married ye lady Cecila Hungerford, daughter to ye Honorable Knight Sir John Tufton, by whom he had two sons, both of which died in their infancy by wicked practises and sorcerye".

It is supported by this source:

Sparham, Bob (23 December 2006). "The Bottesford Witches, Introduction". Bottesford Community Heritage Project. Retrieved August 2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)

I think this is an unreliable source as it is from a locally published website with no academic oversight. So the opinions should be removed. I have found one other equally unreliable source for the inscription:

Sarah Willis, "Dr Bernard Wilson", Newark Civic Trust Issue 68, February 2013, page 12.

Therefore I think Sparham can be trusted for the inscription but the rest of the quote should go. -- PBS (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]