Talk:Francis Owen (philologist)
Appearance
![]() | Francis Owen (philologist) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 22, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Francis Owen (philologist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 06:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Lede
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- Yes, concise
Early Life and Education
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- Good, well narrated.
- Neat, well scribed. Would that it were that the Commonwealth (and Winston) were appraised of his views.
Career
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- 'tis a pity all these references to Edmonton Journal require registration to read
Later Life
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- Welcommen in Deutschland.
- Well scribed, well referenced.
Selected Works
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- A link to the University of Chicago Wikipedia page is not a good reference. It seems the best reference might be to Alliterative_verse
See Also
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- Examined.
References
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- All examined
Further Reading
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- The University of Alberta is Down For Maintenance !
End Matter
[edit]- Is it is Broad in its coverage?
- Yes
- Is it Verifiable with no original research?
- Yes, all information is suitably referenced
- Does the article meet notability guidelines?
- Yes.
- Does it follow WP:NPOV Neutral Point of View?
- Quite so.
- Is it stable?
- This page started life on 31 August 2019
- Over 90 days, this page has had 190 views
- There have been six human editors (bots have been on the page)
- There have been 39 edits to the page with no evidence of edit warring.
- Top editors are
* Krakkos * Chewings72 * John of Reading * Orenburg1 * DuncanHill * FeanorStar7
- It is illustrated by images ?
- The image of Dr. Francis Owen is a picture of Francis Owen printed in the Edmonton Journal
- This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired
Overall
[edit]- Good work, good scribing.
Conclusion
[edit] Passed --Whiteguru (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC) @Krakkos:
- Great! Krakkos (talk) 13:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages