Talk:Frank Hadden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleFrank Hadden was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 23, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Work required[edit]

Am thinking what more is necessary for this article to be more or less complete? The only thing I tihnk we definitely need more information on is the performances of Edinburgh whilst he was coach. I've had real trouble finding out exactly how they have done. I'm sure if a couple of well referenced paragraph's were added on this then the article would be ready for GA nomination? Any comments? - Shudda talk 04:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff that would be nice would be the actual years that he was coach of the Scotland age sides would be useful. Why he did an exchange with The Southport School, and who selected him to assist with the Caly Reds. Refind all the Scotsman links, as they seem to be down (at the moment anyway... maybe link to a cached page). Was he actually born in Dundee or was it just outside in Inver something? When did he play with Dundee HSFP? the years he was at strathclyde uni and carnegie school. what inspired him to go into PE? when did he start at Guisely? --Bob 16:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of that is interesting but some of it may be hard to find, as well, it's probably not nearly as important as describing his coaching career since professionalism. I've tried to find lots regarding the Caledonian Reds but it's been hard. I have no idea about the Scotsman links, cause they certainly worked last week!- Shudda talk 22:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Hold[edit]

Almost everything's cool IMO except this


Not sourced fix that and i'll pass it

†he Bread 3000 06:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of the above is 100% accurate, unfortunately, in the internet age an online reference is not going to be found easily for all of that. What we do have, however, are the records of MCS itself. Would a reference noting the school magazines be sufficient? There were three per year during Franks time. If somebody wanted to verify they could call the school and ask directly. --Bob 08:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That should be okay all that stuff you mentioned

†he Bread 3000 09:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passed[edit]

That's all good it's at GA standard now

†he Bread 3000 00:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Frank Hadden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a number of serious issues that need to be addressed.

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
The prose is poor, maybe a 5/10.
The lead is too short and does not adequately summarise the article.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
Early and personal life information is almost totally missing. This must be incorporated.
Update this to take into account recent developments and expand to provide more information on his coaching career.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No action in a month, this is no longer a GA.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frank Hadden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]