Talk:Fraunces Tavern

One building or two

The Fraunces Tavern museum treats the building as a continuous structure, and presumably they are in a position to know. Unless you have documentation that indicates the old structure was entirely demolished, it should be treated as one building. Nowhere except in your version of the article is Fraunces Tavern treated as two buildings. Given all of the fires and rennovations that occured in the 19th century, if every one was considered a "new building" then we could say there were five Fraunces Taverns just as easily as two. The controversy over the rennovation is addressed in a NPOV manner. Sylvain1972 17:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

First, the museum is not impartial; they have a vested interest in depicting the structure as a continuous structure with a pre-Revolutionary War existence. "Nowhere except in your version of the article is Fraunces Tavern treated as two buildings," is blatently false. The American Institute of Architects views it as a new building, and dates it to 1907.

You are making the

This is my grandfather's axe

I've replaced the handle three times

I've replaced the blade two times

This my grandfather's axe

argument. The point is that until the turn of the twentieth century the structure had a continuous existence. The reconstruction which was completed in 1907 is effectively a new building, which constitutes a guess as to what the original Fraunces Tavern might have looked like. To represent it as the original building updated is fraudulent, when we know better. -- Cecropia 17:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

You've erased the information indicating that the structure did not have a "continous existence" in the sense that it was burned and extensively renovated many times in the 19th century--the reason, in fact, that no one knew what the 18th century building looked like in 1907. There is no indication that the 1907 renovation was more comprehensive than earlier ones.

Here is an article in the New York Times identifying Fraunces Tavern as "the oldest building in Manhattan" :http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E0D61338F93AA15757C0A962948260

Furthermore, my version at least acknowledges the difference of opinion right way, rather then present one point of view as unchallenged fact. Sylvain1972 18:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Pronunciation help

I am in contact with a professional voice actor who is trying to record a spoken version of George Washington and he wants to hear someone pronounce "Fraunces Tavern". If anyone would be willing to call him up or even leave a voice mail with the proper pronunciation, please email me and I will send you his contact info. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 18:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, o

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fraunces Tavern. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110721060410/http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natregsearchresult.do?fullresult=true&recordid=0 to http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natregsearchresult.do?fullresult=true&recordid=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)