Talk:Fred Rosser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tv.com credits[edit]

http://www.tv.com/fred-sampson/person/357282/appearances.html?tag=page_nav;subtabs;appearances

a link there, I've added him ages ago when he first appeared on WWE showing, you can collect dates from that if needed. Govvy (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Black John Cena[edit]

Darren Young has stated himself that he has been called "The Black John Cena". Why is an interview/promo he's done considered "inappropriate"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.164.248.206 (talk) 02:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really need to be noted? I mean come on. --The Dark Lord of Wiki! (Your Ruler) 21:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is about verifiable truth. Any alleged social taboo is irrelevant. ---SilentRAGE! 15:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Young's age[edit]

Matt Striker recently stated on commentary on NXT that Young is "under 26 years old." That contradicts the age that is set here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.244.164 (talk) 15:21, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On Sam Roberts Wrestling podcast episode 29, he states that he is 31 years old and that it's listed wrong on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.14.212 (talk) 20:05, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 00:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Young (wrestler) → Darren Young – Due to all the mainstream coverage of his homosexuality, I think it's clear he is the primary topic. The two footballers he shares his name with are virtually unknown outside their home countries, while this wrestler works for an international organization. GeicoHen (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support the recent coverage wouldn't be enough alone, but page view statistics show that the wrestler seems to have been the primary topic since 2010. Google news and web search are also dominated by coverage of the wrestler. Peter James (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I agree. It's evident that he's been the primary topic for a while. Much like when I had to move Luke James. Teammm talk
    email     18:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I disagree. No clear primary topic here. The fact he "works for an international organization" is irrelevant. The important fact is whether a large proportion of people will have heard of him. The answer is no. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The wrestler has ten times the coverage of the scottish soccer player, who is more popular than the english one. Teammm talk
email 12:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So Americans like wrestlers and there are lots more Americans writing fanboy drivel online than Europeans, as there are far more of them. So what? -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Has anyone heard of those two footballers? The wrestler is pretty clearly the most notable one. All news results cover him. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your opinion, Necrothesp. However, the reliable sources, not blogs, are clear who's WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Teammm talk
email 19:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Obvious primary topic. Whether people have heard of him or not is truly irrelevant - he's clearly the most known. He has the most amount of incoming links, his page views are much higher than the two footballers, and he has the most usage in reliable sources - that's all of the primary topic criteria. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support He is the primary topic.LM2000 (talk) 18:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.


Vandalism?[edit]

Shouldn't this be removed? "One has to suspect that he only came out to save himself from being futured endeavored." F4wEX (talk) 03:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Darren Young. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Darren Young. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Darren Young. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Rosser&oldid=1208369753"